The Difference Between Passive and Active Fire Protection
When it comes to safeguarding lives and property, fire protection stands as a critical aspect of building design and safety. Two primary approaches are used to prevent and mitigate the devastating effects of fires: active fire protection and passive fire protection. While both these methods aim to minimise the risks associated with fires, they operate in fundamentally different ways.
Here, we delve into the distinctions between active and passive fire protection, exploring their definitions, key features, and which is required for a plant or site.
Understanding active fire protection
Active fire protection involves systems and technologies that require an active response to detect, suppress, or control a fire once it has ignited. These systems can rely on either human intervention or automated processes to initiate action.
Examples of active fire protection include fire hydrants, fire hoses, automatic suppression systems in commercial kitchens, and fire alarms integrated with emergency lighting.
Some key features of active fire protection include:
Fire detection systems
These systems use detectors such as smoke detectors, heat detectors, or flame detectors to identify the presence of fire or smoke. When triggered, they activate alarms and alert occupants to the danger.
Fire alarm and communication systems
An essential aspect of active fire protection is the ability to quickly communicate the presence of a fire to building occupants, emergency responders, and relevant authorities. Alarm systems and communication networks play a crucial role in this aspect.
Fire suppression systems
A fire suppression system is a set of integrated components designed to detect, control, and suppress fires automatically. It’s a crucial safety measure used in buildings, facilities, and vehicles to minimise the risk of fire-related damage and protect lives. The main purpose of a fire suppression system is to quickly and effectively suppress fires or control their spread until emergency responders arrive.
A fire suppression system typically consists of five key elements: detectors, an alarm system, suppression agents, activation mechanisms, and a control panel. Ardent automatic suppression systems can be tailored to specific sectors and applications, for both static and mobile plant.
Exploring passive fire protection
Passive fire protection, on the other hand, involves architectural and structural elements that are incorporated into the building's design. The purpose of these elements is to contain or slow down the spread of fire, smoke, and heat. Examples of passive fire protection include fire-resistant drywall, fire doors with intumescent seals, fire-resistant glazing, and the use of fire-resistant insulation.
Unlike active systems that respond to an ongoing fire, passive fire protection measures are designed to prevent or delay fire from spreading. Key features of passive fire protection include:
Fire-resistant construction materials
Passive fire protection relies on using materials with high fire resistance, such as fire-rated walls, floors, and doors. These materials are intended to withstand the heat and flames of a fire for a certain period, providing a barrier to its progress.
This involves dividing a building into fire-resistant compartments or zones, each designed to contain the fire within a specific area and prevent its rapid spread to other parts of the building.
Fire-resistant coatings and sealants
Specialised coatings and sealants are applied to structural elements like steel beams and columns,enhancing their fire resistance and allowing them to maintain structural integrity during a fire.
Passive or active fire protection: which is required?
Active and passive fire protection are two distinct yet interconnected strategies employed to safeguard lives and property from the devastating effects of fires. While active fire protection relies on detection, suppression, and intervention to respond to ongoing fires, passive fire protection focuses on preventative measures that inhibit the spread of fire, smoke, and heat.
Both approaches are essential components of a comprehensive fire safety plan and should be thoughtfully integrated into building design and construction to create a robust and effective fire protection strategy.